The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including a VA examination to determine if the veteran's current knee disabilities are related to his service-connected right ankle disability or parachuting activities in service.
The deciding factor: The decision is based on the need for further medical evaluation and opinion regarding the etiology of the veteran's knee disorders.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral degenerative joint disease
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 25, 2006
- Citation
- 0602077
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,177 · Granted: 24% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0602077.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for the Veteran's bilateral heel spurs, bilateral degenerative joint disease, and right plantar fasciitis. The issue of service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder is remanded.
- Granted
The Veteran's claims for service connection for right hand trigger finger and bilateral degenerative joint disease have been granted. The effective dates are set at June 4, 2009. The Board has also remanded the cases to determine appropriate initial ratings.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for right and left shoulder disabilities due to inadequate medical opinions in the June 2021 addendum.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to inadequate rationale in the medical opinion provided. The Veteran's claim for service connection for a bilateral foot disability is being returned to the AOJ for further development.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.