The Board has denied the petition to reopen and the underlying claim for service connection for heart disease (diagnosed as coronary artery disease) due to lack of medical evidence establishing a nexus between the appellant's current condition and his military service.
The deciding factor: The most persuasive opinion on the question of whether there is a medical nexus between the appellant's coronary artery disease and his military service weighs against the claim.
- Claimed conditions
- heart disease (diagnosed as coronary artery disease), vascular disease
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 26, 2006
- Citation
- 0602248
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,196 · Granted: 17% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0602248.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
Your appeals for service connection have been dismissed due to the Veteran's death. The Board cannot issue a decision on these claims as they are no longer pending.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims of asthma, pulmonary edema, COPD, vascular disease, dementia, and gastroenteritis due to a lack of evidence regarding service connection.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims of service connection for various conditions due to a lack of STRs and personnel records, which may indicate potential exposure to ionizing radiation or toxic exposure during service. The Veteran's participation in a TERA while stationed in Japan is also under review.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the matter for further development, specifically requesting addendum medical opinions to address the nature and etiology of the Veteran's claimed bilateral pes planus and other orthopedic foot disorders, as well as lower extremity peripheral vascular disease.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.