The case is being remanded for further examination and development due to changes in rating criteria.
The deciding factor: Changes in the rating criteria necessitate a review of the appellant's condition with updated examinations.
- Claimed conditions
- back strain
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 27, 2006
- Citation
- 0602405
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for a secondary service connection opinion regarding whether the Veteran's back strain is aggravated by his service-connected left knee sprain.
- Partly granted
The Veteran's service connection for migraine headaches was granted as secondary to his service-connected disabilities, while other conditions were denied.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection and compensation for various conditions, including right hip strain, PTSD, and left ankle condition, among others.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for service connection for an abdominal muscle contusion and back strain was dismissed due to the untimely filing of the Board Appeal request.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.