The Board denied service connection for a genitourinary disability, but granted a 40% rating for the veteran's residuals of diskectomy and laminectomy at L5-S1 effective September 23, 2002.
The deciding factor: The evidence did not support a relationship between the veteran's current genitourinary condition and service or his service-connected low back disability. However, he was granted a higher rating for his diskectomy and laminectomy based on new evidence of increased severity.
- Claimed conditions
- genitourinary disability, post-void dribbling
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 40%
- Decision date
- February 9, 2006
- Citation
- 0603850
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 407 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0603850.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeals for initial compensable rating for bilateral hearing loss and service connection prior to June 27, 2024, for a genitourinary disability were dismissed due to the Veteran's death.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for a genitourinary disability due to insufficient evidence of a current disability.
- Dismissed
The Board dismissed the claims for service connection for a gynecological disability, gastrointestinal disability, and genitourinary disability as they were part of an appeal that was already pending.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for bilateral hearing loss and a genitourinary disability, including erectile dysfunction, penile skin nodule, and status-post prostate cancer. The case will be returned to the RO for further development.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.