The Board has denied the appellant's claim for service connection for residuals of a pilonidal cyst, finding that there is no objective evidence showing that she had a pilonidal cyst in service or removal of a pilonidal cyst in service.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner opined that because the appellant did not have any objective evidence of a pilonidal cyst in service, any residuals that she currently had were not related to her service.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of a pilonidal cyst
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 14, 2006
- Citation
- 0604234
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,710 · Granted: 15% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0604234.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran was granted service connection for tinnitus and residuals of a pilonidal cyst, but denied service connection for bilateral hearing loss, diabetes mellitus type II, skin disability other than a pilonidal cyst, and back disability.,Service connection was established for tinnitus due to exposure to noise during service. Residuals of the pilonidal cyst were also granted as it had its onset during service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection due to insufficient opinions regarding the etiology of his pilonidal cyst and esophageal cancer. The examiner is asked to provide a detailed opinion on whether these conditions are related to his military service, with particular attention given to the May 1990 Zumwalt report.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for special monthly compensation based on the need for aid and attendance or housebound status is being remanded due to an inadequate VA examination. The case will be reviewed after further development.
- Granted
The Veteran's residuals of a pilonidal cyst are not productive of limitation of function, and he was granted an initial noncompensable evaluation. The claims for service connection for left ear hearing loss and right ear hearing loss were reopened but denied due to lack of new and material evidence. The claim for service connection for tinnitus was also reopened but denied.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.