Remanded (sent back)
The case is being remanded for scheduling a Board videoconference hearing at the RO in Los Angeles. The veteran and his former wife (the appellant) are seeking an apportionment of the veteran's VA benefits, but no specific conditions or issues related to service connection are mentioned.
The deciding factor: The appeal requires further action due to the need for scheduling a hearing as requested by the appellant.
- Claimed conditions
- Not specified in this decision
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 23, 2006
- Citation
- 0605125
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.