The Board has determined that the veteran's claimed chronic acquired heart disorder was not incurred or aggravated in service and denied his claim.
The deciding factor: There is no competent clinical evidence showing a diagnosis of heart disease during or within one year after service, and current medical findings do not support a finding of any present disability attributable to service.
- Claimed conditions
- chronic acquired heart disorder
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 28, 2006
- Citation
- 0605711
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,514 · Granted: 19% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0605711.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board found that the veteran's claimed heart and respiratory disorders were not incurred or aggravated by service, nor could they be presumed to have been caused by service. The evidence did not support a finding of chronicity in service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The veteran's appeal for service connection of a chronic acquired heart disorder is being remanded due to procedural deficiencies in the VCAA notice.
- Denied
The Board has determined that a chronic acquired heart disorder was not incurred in or aggravated by active service and cannot be presumed to have been incurred due to exposure to any presumptive conditions. The veteran's current diagnosed condition is not linked to his military service.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.