The Board is remanding the case for further development to address whether service connection can be granted for the cause of the veteran's death and whether DIC benefits under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1318 can be awarded.
The deciding factor: The decision will depend on a thorough review of the medical records, including the contemporaneous treatment records and the opinions provided by the treating physician.
- Claimed conditions
- non-small cell lung carcinoma, residuals of a gunshot wound of the left forearm, residuals of a gunshot wound of the right thigh with partial paralysis of the sciatic nerve and right lower extremity weakness, donor site bone graft on the left leg
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 2, 2006
- Citation
- 0606021
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,480 · Granted: 26% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0606021.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the claim for service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death, finding that there was no evidence linking the lung cancer to military service or any service-connected disabilities.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a pre-decisional duty to assist error, specifically regarding the adequacy of the VA examiner's opinion on the cause of the Veteran's non-small cell lung carcinoma.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases due to insufficient evidence and for further development, including obtaining relevant non-VA treatment records from Siteman Cancer Center and Barnes-Jewish Hospital.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases due to a lack of VA examinations and requests for additional private treatment records. The Veteran's service-connected brain metastasis and lung cancer have had their disability ratings reduced, but the Board is seeking further evidence or opinions before making a final determination.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.