The Board has remanded the veteran's claims for a right wrist and hand disability as secondary to his service-connected left hand disability status post fifth finger resection, and for TDIU due to service-connected disabilities. The RO is instructed to obtain additional records, conduct VA examinations, and readjudicate the claims.
The deciding factor: The Board found that further development was necessary to address the nature and extent of the veteran's left hand disability status post fifth finger resection, its relationship to his right wrist and hand disability, and the effect on employability due to these disabilities.
- Claimed conditions
- right wrist and hand disability, left hand disability status post fifth finger resection
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 8, 2006
- Citation
- 0606601
Veterans Law Judge
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0606601.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that further development is necessary to determine the etiology of any current right hand or wrist disability and whether it is related to service.
- Denied
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been submitted to reopen the claim of entitlement to compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for additional right wrist and hand disability as a result of VA hospitalization or medical or surgical treatment from September 1949 to March 1950, but the claim is still denied on its merits.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case to comply with the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000 and to obtain additional records from a VA Medical Center in Dallas, Texas. The veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 is being reopened due to new evidence submitted.
- Denied
The Board has determined that new and material evidence was submitted to reopen the claim of entitlement to benefits under the provisions of 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for additional right wrist and hand disability, but denied the claim as there is no evidence showing that current right wrist or hand disability resulted from VA hospitalization or medical treatment received in September 1949 to March 1950.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.