The veteran's claim for restoration of a 50 percent rating for visual field loss due to sickle cell retinopathy was denied.,The veteran's claim for an effective date prior to September 5, 1995, for the assignment of the 50 percent disability rating for visual field loss due to sickle cell retinopathy was denied.,The veteran's claim for an effective date prior to July 17, 1995, for the assignment of the 30 percent disability rating for sickle cell disease was granted.
The deciding factor: The RO found that the evidence did not meet the criteria for restoration of a 50 percent evaluation for visual field loss due to bilateral sickle cell retinopathy.,The RO found that the earliest date as of which it is factually ascertainable that an increase in the appellant's sickle cell disease occurred was July 17, 1995. Therefore, the effective date prior to September 5, 1995, for the assignment of the 50 percent disability rating for visual field loss due to sickle cell retinopathy was denied.,The RO found that the earliest date as of which it is factually ascertainable that an increase in the appellant's sickle cell disease occurred was July 17, 1995. Therefore, the effective date prior to July 17, 1995, for the assignment of the 30 percent disability rating for sickle cell disease was granted.
- Claimed conditions
- visual field loss due to bilateral sickle cell retinopathy, sickle cell disease
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 50%
- Decision date
- March 13, 2006
- Citation
- 0607226
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,987 · Granted: 15% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0607226.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's adult daughter, P. J., is diagnosed with sickle cell disease and may be receiving Social Security Disability benefits. The AOJ failed to obtain relevant SSA records for P. J. prior to the November 2023 rating decision, which requires remand.
- Dismissed
The Veteran withdrew his appeal for service connection for sickle cell disease, and the Board dismissed it.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for sickle cell disease, right eye glaucoma, right hip avascular necrosis, and renal disorder as secondary to sickle cell disease.,Service connection was not granted due to the Veteran's pre-existing condition of sickle cell disease.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for sickle cell disease, right eye glaucoma, right hip avascular necrosis, and renal disorder due to lack of evidence showing aggravation during service or any other basis.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.