The veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for additional development and notification.
The deciding factor: The case was remanded because of procedural issues related to adequate notice under the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000.
- Claimed conditions
- fracture of the right ankle
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 15, 2006
- Citation
- 0607428
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,055 · Granted: 31% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0607428.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for a medical review and nexus opinion on whether the Veteran's service-connected disabilities contributed to his death. The clinician is asked to provide an opinion based on at least 50 percent probability.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient development and a need for an addendum opinion from a clinician with experience in vascular and pulmonary disease.
- Denied
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has not been presented to reopen the claim for service connection for a fracture of the right ankle, as the additional evidence does not raise a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claim.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to conflicting medical opinions regarding service connection and aggravation of hearing loss and right ankle conditions.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.