Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Denied

The veteran's service-connected amebiasis is manifested by subjective reports of diarrhea, constipation, and abdominal cramping but not by objective findings. A noncompensable evaluation is warranted.,Prior to August 13, 1996, the veteran's service-connected residuals of a stress fracture of the left os calcis were manifested by foot pain and x-ray evidence of small calcaneal spur. A 20 percent evaluation is warranted.,The veteran's service-connected residuals of a stress fracture of the left os calcis are currently manifested by foot pain, but no other pertinent abnormal clinical findings or x-ray evidence of acute fracture, dislocation, or bone destruction. An increased evaluation in excess of 20 percent is not warranted.

The deciding factor: The veteran's amebiasis has not resulted in the symptomatology required for a compensable evaluation at any time since the effective date of service connection.,The current symptomatology associated with the veteran's service-connected residuals of stress fracture of the left os calcis is best encapsulated by a 20 percent disabling evaluation. The foot pain he experiences was objectively demonstrated in multiple VA treatment records and on VA examination, which impacts his ability to walk long distances and climb stairs.,There is no objective x-ray evidence of any acute fracture, dislocation, or bone destruction shown on VA examination either in August 2002 or January 2005. The veteran's functional ability was not significantly impacted by the residuals of stress fracture of the left os calcis.

Claimed conditions
amebiasis, residuals of a stress fracture of the left os calcis
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
March 15, 2006
Citation
0607506

Veterans Law Judge

JOY A. MCDONALD

Decisions by this judge: 1,293 · Granted: 17% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0607506.

What this means for you

A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.