The veteran's herpes simplex virus II is currently evaluated as 60 percent disabling on and after August 30, 2002. The right ear disability remains noncompensable under the old rating criteria but becomes compensable under the new criteria.,Service connection for herpes simplex virus keratitis of the right eye has been granted.
The deciding factor: The veteran's current diagnoses are considered chronic and not attributable to intercurrent causes, warranting service connection.
- Claimed conditions
- Herpes Simplex Virus II, Herpes Simplex Virus Keratitis of the Right Eye, Herpes Zoster Oticus of the Right Ear
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 60%
- Decision date
- April 6, 2006
- Citation
- 0610003
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,293 · Granted: 17% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0610003.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's herpes simplex virus II and atopic dermatitis were found to meet the criteria for a 60 percent rating from December 21, 2011 to February 18, 2016.
- Denied
The Veteran's appeal for an increased rating for her gynecological disorder and TDIU was denied. The Board found that the evidence did not support a finding of unemployability solely due to service-connected disorders.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for an initial compensable rating prior to August 19, 2013 and in excess of 10 percent from that date for herpes simplex virus II is being remanded due to the need to apply both old and new rating criteria. The AOJ should also obtain any additional medical records and provide the Veteran with an opportunity to identify healthcare providers who have treated him since the March 2014 supplemental statement of the case.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.