The Board denied the veteran's claims for higher initial evaluations for his service-connected disabilities, finding that the assigned disability ratings did not accurately reflect their severity.
The deciding factor: The RO and Board found that the evidence did not support granting higher initial evaluations based on the current criteria in place at the time of the decision.
- Claimed conditions
- ulnar palsy, median nerve damage, shell fragment wound, left zygomatic arch, shell fragment wound, lacerated brachial artery
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- April 10, 2006
- Citation
- 0610354
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,467 · Granted: 18% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0610354.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has granted a 50 percent rating for ulnar nerve damage. The petition to reopen the claim for stomach muscle strain as secondary to crush injury is remanded, and separate ratings are also remanded for ulnar nerve damage, median nerve damage, and lower radicular group nerve damage. A TDIU issue is referred back to the RO.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's service-connected residuals of a gunshot wound to the right forearm with incomplete paralysis of the median nerve are rated at 40 percent since December 9, 2008. Separate evaluations for painful scars associated with the wounds have been granted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete development of evidence and need for further examination, particularly regarding carpal tunnel syndrome.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.