The veteran's disability compensation benefits were properly restored to a 70 percent rate, effective April 1, 2002.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the RO's reduction of the veteran's disability rating was in violation of applicable law and regulations, leading to the decision being set aside and the prior rating (70%) being restored.
- Claimed conditions
- Multiple shrapnel wounds
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 70%
- Decision date
- April 11, 2006
- Citation
- 0610446
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,293 · Granted: 17% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0610446.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has determined that there was no clear and unmistakable error in the March 1972, November 1973, or April 1997 rating decisions regarding service connection for multiple shrapnel wounds and scar tissue.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased evaluations for his shell fragment wounds of both legs, finding that the evidence did not support ratings higher than the current 30 percent and 20 percent assigned.
- Denied
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for increased disability ratings and effective dates for his service-connected multiple shrapnel wounds, as it is not factually ascertainable that the disabilities increased in severity prior to February 13, 2001.
- Denied
The October 31, 1969 rating decision correctly assigned a 100 percent evaluation for anatomical loss of both feet and special monthly compensation on account of anatomical loss of both lower extremities at levels or with complications preventing natural knee action with prostheses in place.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.