The veteran's appeal is remanded due to inadequate reasons and bases in the previous Board decision. The case must be returned for an examination during a flare-up of his skin condition, review of all pertinent records from Hines VAMC, and consideration of whether referral to the Under Secretary for Benefits or the Director, Compensation and Pension Service, for an extraschedular evaluation is warranted.
The deciding factor: The Board found inadequate reasons and bases in its previous decision and ordered remand due to insufficient explanation regarding examination during flare-ups and lack of consideration of extraschedular evaluation.
- Claimed conditions
- mycosis fungoides
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 11, 2006
- Citation
- 0610459
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 175 · Granted: 26% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0610459.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran is granted an effective date of September 1, 2023, for the 100 percent disability rating of lymphomatoid papulosis, to include mycosis fungoides, and painful scarring (non-Hodgkin's lymphoma).
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal has been dismissed as he withdrew his appeals for the initial compensable rating, a rating in excess of 60 percent, and a 10 percent rating for multiple non-compensable service connected disabilities.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for mycosis fungoides and a thyroid disability due to a duty to assist error. A VA examination is required to determine if these conditions are related to active service.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date of January 12, 2018, for the grant of service connection for mycosis fungoides. The earliest indication of diagnosis was on that date.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.