The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for a rectal abscess, finding that it was not incurred in or aggravated by active service and may not be presumed to have been incurred due to exposure to Agent Orange. The evidence did not show any relationship between the current condition and his military service.
The deciding factor: The Board concluded that the veteran's rectal abscess is not related to his military service, including as a result of herbicide exposure during service.
- Claimed conditions
- rectal abscess
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 14, 2006
- Citation
- 0610683
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,677 · Granted: 26% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0610683.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeals for service connection on the issues of degenerative osteoarthritis, bronchitis, seborrheic keratosis, a low back disorder, a rectal abscess status post excision, and headaches with dizziness have been dismissed. The Board has also remanded these issues for further development.
- Denied
The Board found that the appellant's periodontal disease and subsequent rectal abscess and rectal fistula are not service-connected due to lack of evidence showing a direct link. The claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 was also denied as there is no indication of VA negligence or fault in the treatment provided.
- Granted
The Veteran's left testicle hematoma resulting in orchiectomy was caused by VA carelessness, negligence, lack of proper skill, error in judgment, or similar instance of fault. The Board finds that the Veteran is entitled to compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for this condition.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for further development, including scheduling a videoconference hearing before the Board.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.