The Board has determined that the veteran's congenital spina bifida was not incurred in or aggravated during active service. The claim for immature personality disorder is denied as new and material evidence has not been submitted.
The deciding factor: The medical evidence does not establish a direct link between the veteran's current condition and his military service, including any exposure to Agent Orange or other potential risk factors.
- Claimed conditions
- Congenital spina bifida, Immature personality disorder
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 17, 2006
- Citation
- 0610860
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,613 · Granted: 30% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0610860.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to conflicting opinions on whether the appellant's mental state at the time of his misconduct was such that he could be considered insane, which is a key factor in determining if his character of discharge bars him from VA benefits.
- Denied
The Board found that the appellant did not have a physical or mental defect rendering him incapable of self-support prior to his 18th birthday, thus denying recognition as a child of the veteran.
- Granted
The veteran's congenital spina bifida and nondisplaced spondylolisthesis at L5-S1 were aggravated during service, and the Board granted service connection for this aggravation.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.