The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for cleft palate, finding that no new and material evidence had been submitted to reopen the claim. The RO in January 1985 initially denied the claim based on the absence of aggravation due to surgery during service.
The deciding factor: No new and material evidence was presented to show that the veteran's cleft palate was aggravated by corrective surgery performed during service, which is a requirement for establishing service connection under the theory of aggravation.
- Claimed conditions
- cleft palate
- How they argued it
- Aggravation of a pre-existing condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- April 18, 2006
- Citation
- 0611031
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,643 · Granted: 15% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0611031.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection due to the need for a VA examination to determine the etiology of the Veteran's claimed residuals from oral surgery. The issues are inextricably intertwined with the claim for service connection for residuals from oral surgery.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities are rated at 100 percent, allowing them to receive VA dental treatment for their conditions.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has determined that the appellant's son, J.D.H., is permanently incapable of self-support due to physical and mental defects prior to his 18th birthday. The appeal for DIC, death pension, and accrued benefits will be remanded for further adjudication.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the appellant's claims for benefits under 38 C.F.R. � 3.815 and 38 C.F.R. � 3.814 as she does not have a manifestation of spina bifida, which is required to qualify for these benefits.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.