The veteran's claim for an increased rating for lumbosacral strain with sciatica is being remanded due to the need for additional medical records and a VA examination.
The deciding factor: Additional evidence, including Social Security Administration disability determinations and treatment records from the VA Medical Center Boise, Idaho, are needed to properly assess the veteran's condition. A VA examination of the lumbosacral strain with sciatica is also required.
- Claimed conditions
- lumbosacral strain with sciatica
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- April 25, 2006
- Citation
- 0611825
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 832 · Granted: 18% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0611825.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's claims of service connection for dry eye syndrome, lumbosacral strain with sciatica, and traumatic brain injury were denied. The Board found no evidence to support a direct relationship between the claimed conditions and active service.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's current lumbosacral strain with sciatica is related to his active military service, and thus grants the claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for lumbosacral strain with sciatica was denied. The claim to reopen the service connection for arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease with myocardial infarction was also denied, as new and material evidence had not been received since a previous denial in 1988. The Veteran's claim for service connection for basal cell carcinoma was denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The veteran's claim for an effective date prior to July 20, 1995 for the service-connected lumbar strain with sciatica is being remanded due to incomplete medical records and a need for further examination.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.