The Board denied the appellant's claims for service connection for the cause of her husband's death and eligibility for Dependant's Education Assistance (DEA) under 38 U.S.C. Chapter 35.
The deciding factor: There was no competent medical evidence to establish a causal relationship between the veteran's service-connected conditions and his cause of death, nor did he have a disability evaluated as total and permanent in nature resulting from a service-connected disability at the time of his death.
- Claimed conditions
- psychoneurosis, hysterical, appendectomy scar
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 25, 2006
- Citation
- 0611898
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0611898.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for earlier effective dates and initial compensable ratings, as well as service connection for various conditions, except for a scar related to a laminectomy which was granted with an effective date of March 22, 2021.
- Partly granted
The Board granted an effective date of October 7, 2021 for the grant of service connection for cervical strain, residuals of status-post appendectomy, tender appendectomy scar, alopecia, and appendectomy scar. The claim for left long finger extensor tenosynovitis was remanded.
- Denied
The Veteran's appendectomy scar has not been found to be painful or unstable, and thus does not meet the criteria for a compensable disability rating.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for loss of use of the right upper extremity was denied, but his claim for special monthly compensation based on aid and attendance (A&A) was granted.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.