The veteran's previously granted 30 percent evaluation for right eye disability is restored to its original level, effective July 1, 2003.
The deciding factor: The RO reduced the evaluation based on a finding of material improvement in visual acuity but failed to consider other manifestations such as permanent pupil dilation and corneal scarring.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of right eye surgery to remove retained glass foreign body, corneal leukoma, permanent pupil dilation, decreased visual acuity
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 30%
- Decision date
- April 26, 2006
- Citation
- 0612019
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,547 · Granted: 20% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0612019.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for further development to address the relationship between left eye punctate keratitis and service-connected conditions, including whether it is secondary to left eye lagophthalmos or a disorder of the lacrimal apparatus.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has ordered a remand for an addendum VA opinion to address the etiology of any left eye disability, including glaucoma, decreased visual acuity, and hypertrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium. The Veteran's reports of diplopia since his in-service surgery are also to be considered.
- Dismissed
The Veteran withdrew his appeal for an increased rating of his service-connected left eye disability, leaving the issue dismissed.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient evidence regarding whether there was sustained improvement in the Veteran's vision impairment related to multiple sclerosis.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.