The Board has granted a 40 percent evaluation for chronic lumbar sprain effective July 15, 2006. The veteran's claims for increased ratings for chronic cervical sprain and left knee medial meniscus tear and anterior cruciate ligament tear are denied.
The deciding factor: The VA examination report of December 27, 2004 showed an increase in symptomatology warranting a higher rating from that date, but not earlier since earlier evidence showed nearly asymptomatic disability.
- Claimed conditions
- Characterized by forward flexion to 30 degrees, extension to 5 degrees, right and left lateral flexion to 20 degrees and rotation to 20 degrees, each with complaints of pain; x-ray evidence of minimal degenerative changes, mild spondylosis and slight narrowing of the L3-4 interspace; muscle tenderness to palpation; no muscle spasm; no neurologic or sensory findings; and no ankylosis., Characterized by forward flexion to 30 degrees, extension to 20 degrees, right and left lateral flexion to 20 degrees and rotation to 20 degrees, each with complaints of pain; x-ray evidence of slight narrowing of the C3-4 and 4-5 interspaces, without degenerative arthritis; muscle tenderness; no muscle spasm, no neurologic or sensory findings; and no ankylosis., Characterized by full extension to 0 degrees, limited flexion to 75 degrees, with complaints of pain; mild crepitation; tenderness to palpation; effusion; and no objective evidence of any recurrent subluxation, lateral instability or ankylosis.
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 40%
- Decision date
- April 28, 2006
- Citation
- 0612265
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0612265.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board granted service connection for obstructive sleep apnea, effective from the date of the February 2025 rating decision.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for a medical examination to determine if the Veteran's current neck strain is related to his in-service activities.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for a rating in excess of 70 percent for PTSD due to an inadequate medical opinion.
- Granted
The Board granted service connection for myasthenia gravis based on the Veteran's exposure to hazardous substances during his military service.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.