The veteran's appeal is remanded for additional development, including a VA examination to assess the severity of his service-connected allergic asthma and proper VCAA notice regarding effective dates.
The deciding factor: The veteran requested an increased rating for his service-connected allergic asthma, which was previously rated at 30 percent. The Board determined that further development is needed due to recent symptom changes and a need for updated medical evidence.
- Claimed conditions
- Allergic asthma
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- May 8, 2006
- Citation
- 0613278
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,013 · Granted: 17% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0613278.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has found that the Veteran's service connection claim for allergic asthma with COPD should be remanded due to inadequate medical opinions regarding the cause of his conditions. The AOJ is instructed to obtain a new medical opinion considering all applicable military deployments and toxic exposures, including Agent Orange exposure.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases of increased rating for allergic asthma and TDIU due to outstanding VA treatment records not yet obtained.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for an increased rating for allergic asthma and TDIU are being remanded due to the need for additional medical records and a readjudication of the cases.
- Partly granted
The Board found new and material evidence, but the appellant's condition was not shown to be permanently incapable of self-support prior to his 18th birthday. The claim is therefore denied as it does not meet the criteria for recognition as a helpless child.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.