The Board has determined that the veteran's residuals of a shell fragment wound to the left forearm and contusion of the left upper arm warrant a 10 percent evaluation, effective from the date of the decision.
The deciding factor: The VA examination revealed tenderness in the area where the shrapnel remained, which was causing pain and weakness in the veteran's hand. The examiner noted that the symptoms were not related to the scar itself but rather to the underlying condition of carpal tunnel syndrome.
- Claimed conditions
- shrapnel wound, contusion
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- May 9, 2006
- Citation
- 0613536
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,582 · Granted: 32% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0613536.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board allowed the benefit or issue identified in this decision. Review the original order: other issues in the same appeal may have a different outcome, and this decision does not predict another claim.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's emergency medical treatment for a leg injury sustained while slipping on ice is covered by VA, as the non-VA facility was not feasibly available and the Veteran did not have other health insurance that fully extinguished his liability.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has granted service connection for residuals of a scrotal shrapnel wound and denied an increased rating for erectile dysfunction.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the Veteran's muscle injuries, specifically a need for an examination and opinion on the severity of his condition.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's right knee disability is rated at 10 percent for the entire period on appeal, and a separate rating of 20 percent for right knee lateral instability from December 26, 2019. The claim for an increased rating for chronic right knee strain, laceration, and contusion was denied.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.