The Board denied the veteran's claim for an extra-schedular evaluation for his service-connected epidermatophytosis with tinea pedis, finding that the evidence did not present such an exceptional or unusual disability picture as to render impractical the application of the regular schedular standards.
The deciding factor: The Board found that there was no objective evidence showing an exceptional or unusual disability not contemplated by the rating schedule and thus concluded that the criteria for referring this case for extra-schedular consideration were not met.
- Claimed conditions
- epidermatophytosis with tinea pedis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 2, 2006
- Citation
- 0616114
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,987 · Granted: 15% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0616114.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the veteran's epidermatophytosis with tinea pedis, including tinea cruris and tinea pedis, warrants a 10 percent rating since August 30, 2002.
- Remanded (sent back)
The veteran's claim for an increased rating for epidermatophytosis with tinea pedis is being remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining relevant VA treatment records and ensuring full compliance with the provisions of the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.