The Board has determined that the evidence does not support a restoration of the 30 percent evaluation for residuals of a right pyelolithotomy and denied the claim for an increased rating.
The deciding factor: The medical findings on examination did not support the veteran's claim of recurrent urinary tract infections, as indicated by negative renal ultrasound results and lack of documented stones or hydronephrosis. The examiner also noted that previous ultrasounds had shown no evidence of these conditions.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of a right pyelolithotomy, recurrent urinary tract infections
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 10%
- Decision date
- June 8, 2006
- Citation
- 0616769
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0616769.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Partly granted
The Board granted a 20 percent disability rating for cervical strain and a separate 10 percent rating for limited lateral excursion range of motion due to TMJD, while denying an initial rating higher than 70 percent for PTSD and dismissing the claim for a rating higher than 10 percent for allergic rhinitis as moot.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for status post hysterectomy, right ankle tendinitis, and recurrent urinary tract infections.
- Granted
The Board granted service connection for a kidney disability, to include recurrent urinary tract infections and pyelonephritis, based on new and relevant evidence that was submitted after the August 2013 rating decision.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient medical opinion regarding the etiology of the Veteran's genitourinary disorder, including recurrent urinary tract infections, pyelonephritis, and medullary sponge kidney. The examiner is instructed to provide an addendum opinion addressing whether these conditions are related to active service.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.