The veteran's claim for payment or reimbursement of non-VA emergency room treatment and related costs from a private facility on August 23, 2002 is being remanded due to incomplete records and the need for proper notification under the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000.
The deciding factor: The decision was based on incomplete medical records and the need for proper notification under the VCAA.
- Claimed conditions
- Seizure
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 8, 2006
- Citation
- 0616833
Veterans Law Judge
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0616833.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran developed an additional disability due to improper VA treatment during a carotid procedure, resulting in a seizure. The evidence supports finding that this was caused by carelessness or negligence on the part of the VA, and thus service connection for residuals of a seizure is granted.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for a seizure, finding no in-service injury or illness related to his current condition and insufficient evidence of continuity of symptoms.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's unauthorized medical expenses incurred at DLC from December 1, 2015 to December 3, 2015 were for a condition of such nature that a prudent layperson would have reasonably expected delay in obtaining treatment would have been hazardous to life or health. As a result, payment or reimbursement is granted.
- Granted
The Veteran's emergency medical services at St. Mary's Hospital were authorized by VA prior to admission, and the Board finds that the criteria for payment or reimbursement of private medical expenses are met.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.