The veteran's claim for higher ratings for his right elbow and right shoulder disabilities was denied. The right elbow had limitation of motion in flexion that met the criteria for a 10 percent rating, but no higher.,For the period April 26, 2002, to December 4, 2005, the veteran received a 10 percent evaluation for his right elbow disability based on limitation of motion in flexion. However, this was not an increased rating as he already had a separate 20 percent evaluation for limitation of motion in extension.,For the period commencing December 5, 2005, the veteran's claim for higher ratings remained denied. The right elbow and shoulder disabilities did not meet the criteria for any higher evaluations.,The veteran was not granted increased ratings for his right shoulder disability as it did not meet the criteria for a rating in excess of 40 percent.,Overall, the veteran's claims were denied with no changes to existing ratings.
The deciding factor: The veteran's conditions did not meet the criteria for higher evaluations based on the specific limitations and diagnoses provided in his medical records.
- Claimed conditions
- Traumatic arthritis of the right elbow, Right shoulder disability
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 8, 2006
- Citation
- 0616907
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,710 · Granted: 15% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0616907.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has denied service connection for a right shoulder disability and remanded the case for further action on heart disability. The decision regarding right shoulder disability is that it was not incurred in or aggravated by service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for various disabilities, including low back, left hip, right hip, left shoulder, and right shoulder disabilities. The VA examinations did not provide adequate opinions regarding the etiology of these conditions.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for the Veteran's right shoulder disability as secondary to his service-connected left shoulder disability, finding that the evidence is in equipoise and granting secondary service connection.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is remanded due to the need for additional examinations and evaluations regarding his claimed knee, shoulder, and back disabilities. The Board finds that a VA examination should be conducted to determine the nature and etiology of any bilateral knee, shoulder, or back disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.