Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The veteran's spouse is seeking payment or reimbursement for unauthorized medical expenses incurred in June 2001. The case has been remanded due to the need for proper adjudication under the Veterans' Millennium Health Care and Benefits Act.

The deciding factor: The claim was not adjudicated under the provisions of the Veterans' Millennium Health Care and Benefits Act, which became effective after the date of the veteran's service discharge.

Claimed conditions
Not specified in this decision
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
June 13, 2006
Citation
0617227

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0617227.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.