The veteran's claim for a disability rating in excess of 10 percent for residuals of an avulsion fracture of the left iliac crest was denied. The Board found that separate evaluations were warranted based on limitation of motion and painful motion related to service-connected arthritis.,The veteran's claims for initial disability evaluation in excess of 20 percent for arthritis of the low back, right hip, and knees, as well as a TDIU, were granted.
The deciding factor: Separate evaluations are warranted based on limitation of motion and painful motion related to service-connected arthritis.,The veteran's claims for initial disability evaluation in excess of 20 percent for arthritis of the low back, right hip, and knees, as well as a TDIU, were granted.
- Claimed conditions
- {"condition_name":"Residuals of an avulsion fracture of the left iliac crest","additional_notes":"Limitation of flexion to 90-100 degrees, extension to 15 degrees, and abduction limited from 25-40 degrees."}, {"condition_name":"Arthritis of the low back","additional_notes":"Severe limitation of motion or no more than severe intervertebral disc syndrome (IVDS) prior to September 23, 2002. From September 23, 2002, there is chronic low back pain with sensory neuropathy of the left lower extremity related to IVDS."}, {"condition_name":"Arthritis of the right hip","additional_notes":"Flexion limited from 90-100 degrees, extension to 15 degrees and abduction limited to 25-40 degrees. On a facts found basis, arthritis of the left knee is manifested by painful motion that is limited in flexion no greater than 82-100 degrees."}, {"condition_name":"Arthritis of the right knee","additional_notes":"Demonstrable limitation of flexion limited to 85-105 degrees. On a facts found basis, arthritis of the left knee is manifested by painful motion that is limited in flexion no greater than 82-100 degrees."}
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 10%
- Decision date
- June 16, 2006
- Citation
- 0617717
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0617717.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board granted service connection for obstructive sleep apnea, effective from the date of the February 2025 rating decision.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for a medical examination to determine if the Veteran's current neck strain is related to his in-service activities.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for a rating in excess of 70 percent for PTSD due to an inadequate medical opinion.
- Granted
The Board granted service connection for myasthenia gravis based on the Veteran's exposure to hazardous substances during his military service.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.