The Board has found that a timely substantive appeal was filed from the October 1998 rating decision which denied service connection for a forearm and right elbow condition, jungle rot of the feet, and frostbite of the hands and feet. The veteran's claim for an increased rating for malaria is also remanded for further development.
The deciding factor: The veteran timely filed a substantive appeal from the October 1998 decision which denied service connection for his claimed conditions.
- Claimed conditions
- forearm and right elbow condition, jungle rot of the feet, frostbite of the hands and feet
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 27, 2006
- Citation
- 0618822
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 832 · Granted: 18% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0618822.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Board dismissed the Veteran's motion for revision based on clear and unmistakable error (CUE) in an April 2022 rating decision, as it was not properly raised with the AOJ first.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for epistaxis, frostbite of the hands and feet, lumbar spine disability, and eye disorder due to inadequate opinions in previous VA examinations.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases for further development and adjudication due to incomplete service treatment records and insufficient medical opinions regarding the Veteran's claimed conditions.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal was dismissed due to his death during the pendency of the appeal, and there is no surviving appellant.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.