The veteran is seeking a higher rating for his service-connected pylorospasm, which was previously granted a 10 percent disability rating. The Board has ordered the case back to the RO for further development and readjudication.
The deciding factor: The decision was remanded due to inadequate medical records and the need for another VA examination to evaluate the current nature and extent of the service-connected pylorospasm.
- Claimed conditions
- pylorospasm
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- July 11, 2006
- Citation
- 0620127
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,514 · Granted: 19% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0620127.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The veteran's appeal is remanded for a new VA examination to assess the current severity of his service-connected pylorospasm and for additional outpatient treatment records to be obtained.
- Denied
The Board denied an increased rating for the veteran's stomach disability, classified as pylorospasm, finding that it did not meet the criteria for a higher evaluation.
- Granted
The Board has determined that a 20 percent disability rating is warranted for the veteran's service-connected pylorospasm from April 9, 2001 to August 7, 2002.
- Granted
The Board has granted a 10 percent disability rating for the veteran's pylorospasm, finding that his condition more nearly approximates the criteria for this evaluation. The next higher rating of 30 percent is not warranted due to lack of recurrent symptoms and ulcer therapy requirements.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.