The May 11, 1990 decision denied service connection for retinitis pigmentosa due to the presumption that it existed prior to service and did not undergo aggravation during service. The Board found this decision was based on clear and unmistakable error (CUE).
The deciding factor: The RO failed to apply the correct legal standard regarding the presumption of soundness and the requirement for showing aggravation of a pre-existing condition.
- Claimed conditions
- retinitis pigmentosa
- How they argued it
- Aggravation of a pre-existing condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 18, 2006
- Citation
- 0620960
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0620960.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board granted an earlier effective date of January 3, 2001, for service connection for retinitis pigmentosa based on the re-evaluation of previously unassociated service treatment records.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to conflicting opinions regarding whether retinitis pigmentosa is a congenital defect or disease. Additional development, including an addendum opinion from the VA examiner, is needed.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to the need for a VA examination to determine if the Veteran's current bilateral eye disorders, including retinitis pigmentosa and cataracts, had their onset during service or are otherwise related to his military service.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for retinitis pigmentosa and denied service connection for a heart condition. The Veteran's current bilateral eye retinitis pigmentosa is considered to have been incurred in service, with the presumption of soundness rebutted due to aggravation during service.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.