The veteran's claims for increased ratings and new examinations are being remanded due to the need for additional VA treatment records, medical records from a private hospital, and VA examinations.
The deciding factor: The Board is unable to make a decision without obtaining updated medical evidence and conducting necessary examinations as requested by the veteran.
- Claimed conditions
- Type I diabetes mellitus, residuals of stress fractures of the second and fourth metatarsals of the left foot, calluses of the left foot
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 19, 2006
- Citation
- 0621211
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 684 · Granted: 25% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0621211.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for Type I diabetes mellitus, finding that it was initially manifested during active service.
- Denied
The Board denied a rating in excess of 10 percent for amputation of the left great toe and granted a separate 10 percent rating for calluses of the left foot. The amputation was not rated higher due to the absence of removal of the metatarsal head, while the calluses were found to be moderate in severity.
- Granted
The Board has granted entitlement to TDIU due to the combined effects of service-connected disabilities, including PFB and bilateral foot calluses. The decision is based on the Veteran's credible testimony regarding his inability to work due to these conditions.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for compensation under 38 U.S.C. � 1511 for residuals of AIP and type I diabetes mellitus, finding that VA treatment did not cause these conditions.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.