The Board has decided to remand the case due to missing National Guard and private medical records, as well as incomplete SSA records. The veteran's claim for service connection for multiple chemical sensitivity will be reviewed again after obtaining these records.
The deciding factor: The decision is based on the need to obtain additional relevant medical records from the National Guard, private physicians, and Social Security Administration (SSA).
- Claimed conditions
- Multiple Chemical Sensitivity
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 28, 2006
- Citation
- 0622432
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,377 · Granted: 17% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0622432.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for service connection for Multiple Chemical Sensitivity and a blood disorder was denied as there is no current diagnosis of either condition, and the 1993 infection is not considered related to his Gulf War service.
- Denied
The VA determined that the veteran's current skin disorder is not related to his military service and denied his claim for service connection.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for the veteran's skin disorder, which is claimed as multiple chemical sensitivity. The decision is based on evidence that links this condition to his military service without relying on any presumption or new and material evidence.
- Granted
The Board found the veteran's PTSD claim well-grounded and granted service connection. For Multiple Chemical Sensitivity, the Board determined that it was related to exposure to Agent Orange during service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.