The veteran seeks service connection for residuals of a left ankle fracture, which the Board finds to be established. The remaining issues are remanded for further development.,Service connection is being remanded for the following conditions: prostate disorder (prostate hyperplasia with elevated PSA), chronic genitourinary disability, and dizziness.
The deciding factor: The veteran's left ankle fracture residuals have been established based on service medical records. The remaining issues are remanded to allow for further development of the evidence.,Service connection is being remanded for prostate disorder (prostate hyperplasia with elevated PSA), chronic genitourinary disability, and dizziness due to the need for additional examination and review of the veteran's claims file.
- Claimed conditions
- Bilateral defective hearing, Chronic genitourinary disability, Dizziness, Prostate disorder (prostate hyperplasia with elevated PSA), Residuals of left ankle fracture
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 1, 2006
- Citation
- 0622868
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,738 · Granted: 17% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0622868.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for SMC based on the need for aid and attendance is remanded due to a pre-decisional duty to assist error. The Board finds that an examination is needed to determine if the Veteran requires aid and attendance of another person due to his service-connected disabilities alone.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for TBI, finding that there is no current disability and insufficient evidence to establish a link between in-service events and his current symptoms.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claim for service connection for vertigo disability to include dizziness and Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (BPPV) due to conflicting medical opinions regarding whether the condition is secondary to service-connected disabilities.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided that the Veteran's claim for a compensable evaluation for bilateral hearing loss must be remanded due to a duty to assist error. The issue of service connection for dizziness related to his hearing loss is also being remanded.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.