The Board denied an earlier effective date for the TDIU rating, finding that it was not factually ascertainable that the veteran became individually unemployable due to his service-connected disabilities prior to September 24, 1997. The RO's decisions in April 1993 and November 1995 were found not to contain clear and unmistakable error.
The deciding factor: The evidence did not show that the veteran had become individually unemployable due to his service-connected disabilities prior to September 24, 1997.
- Claimed conditions
- {"condition_name":"Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)"}, {"condition_name":"Shell fragment wound, right buttock, right thigh, Muscle Group XVII"}, {"condition_name":"Shell fragment wound, left leg (calf), Muscle Group XI"}, {"condition_name":"Shell fragment wound, right forearm (major) right ulnar nerve involvement"}, {"condition_name":"Shell fragment wound, upper right forearm (major), Muscle Group VIII, with retained foreign body"}, {"condition_name":"Shell fragment wound of the back, involvement of Muscle Group XX"}, {"condition_name":"Skin graft donor site, right thigh"}, {"condition_name":"Shell fragment wound, tender scar, right arm (major)"}, {"condition_name":"Shell fragment wound, left thigh, Muscle Group XIII"}
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 70%
- Decision date
- August 14, 2006
- Citation
- 0624931
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0624931.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board granted service connection for obstructive sleep apnea, effective from the date of the February 2025 rating decision.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for a medical examination to determine if the Veteran's current neck strain is related to his in-service activities.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for a rating in excess of 70 percent for PTSD due to an inadequate medical opinion.
- Granted
The Board granted service connection for myasthenia gravis based on the Veteran's exposure to hazardous substances during his military service.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.