The veteran claims service connection for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, which was diagnosed during his military service and linked to exposure to Agent Orange. The case is remanded due to the need for a VA examination to determine if the condition is related to service.
The deciding factor: A VA examination is needed to determine whether the veteran's ALS is related to his military service, including exposure to Agent Orange.
- Claimed conditions
- Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- Agent Orange / herbicides
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 23, 2006
- Citation
- 0626166
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,293 · Granted: 17% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0626166.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for automobile and adaptive equipment or adaptive equipment only, finding that his service-connected disabilities do not meet the criteria for eligibility based on physical loss of use of hands/feet, permanent impairment of vision in both eyes, or ankylosis of knees/hips.
- Granted
The Board has granted an earlier effective date of December 13, 2021 for the grant of special monthly compensation (SMC) based on aid and attendance due to a factual determination that an increase in disability occurred on that date.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for specially adapted housing (SAH) and special home adaptation (SHA) grants due to lack of service-connected disabilities that meet the eligibility criteria.
- Denied
The Board denied the appellant's claims for service connection for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and eligibility for financial assistance in purchasing an automobile or adaptive equipment, as well as for specially adapted housing and a special home adaptation grant due to lack of qualifying active military service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.