The veteran's appeal is remanded for further development, including VA examinations and the provision of VCAA notification letters.
The deciding factor: The case must be remanded due to a lapse in time since the last VA examination and because some issues have not yet been adjudicated by the RO.
- Claimed conditions
- shell fragment wounds of the left shoulder with back strain, shell fragment wound, thoracic region of the back
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 25, 2006
- Citation
- 0626485
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0626485.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's left shoulder disability, resulting from a shell fragment wound sustained during service, is currently rated at 20 percent and the claim for an increased evaluation has been denied.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for an evaluation in excess of 10 percent for residuals of a shell fragment wound incurred in May 1970, to the right shoulder with foreign body and scar is denied. The appeal as to other issues are remanded.
- Denied
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have any right leg residuals or disorder due to a shell fragment wound injury or any other event or incident of his period of active service, including duty in Korea. Therefore, service connection for the claimed condition is denied.
- Denied
The Board denied revising a February 25, 1971 rating decision on the basis of CUE and denying assigning an effective date prior to September 26, 1997 for an award of TDIU. The errors identified did not manifestly change the outcome.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.