Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Board has determined that the appellant's case needs to be returned to the RO for review of additional evidence, including personnel records submitted by the appellant. The appeal is remanded due to a lack of response from the appellant regarding further action.

The deciding factor: The appellant did not respond to the request for his waiver of RO review of additional evidence within the required timeframe.

Claimed conditions
Not specified in this decision
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
September 6, 2006
Citation
0627825

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0627825.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.