The Board has determined that additional development is needed to determine the appellant's eligibility for reimbursement of medical expenses due to chest pain treatment at St. Michael Hospital in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma from August 20, 2002, through August 22, 2002.
The deciding factor: The claims file needs to be reviewed and additional development is required to determine the appellant's eligibility for reimbursement under VA regulations.
- Claimed conditions
- chest pain
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 8, 2006
- Citation
- 0628187
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0628187.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for chest pain, a gastrointestinal disability, a neck disability, and a bilateral knee disability. The Veteran was also denied a compensable rating for iliotibial band syndrome of the right hip and for right hip limitation of extension.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for service connection for shortness of breath and chest pain due to an inadequate VA examination and opinion.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for an initial compensable rating for erectile disorder, headaches, and service connection for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), chest pain, bilateral leg conditions, and somatic symptom disorder.
- Dismissed
The Board dismissed the veteran's appeals for failure to timely file a notice of disagreement within one year of the rating decisions.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.