The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for residuals of rheumatic fever and a lung condition noted as COPD and chronic bronchitis based on tobacco use and nicotine dependence during active service, finding no evidence of current disability or residual effects from rheumatic fever. The claim for COPD was remanded to obtain an opinion regarding the cause of the veteran's condition.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner could not provide a medical nexus between the veteran's current lung condition and her tobacco use during service due to lack of evidence in the record.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of rheumatic fever, lung condition (noted as COPD and chronic bronchitis)
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 14, 2006
- Citation
- 0629148
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0629148.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Partly granted
The Veteran's sleep apnea is granted service connection. The remaining claims are remanded for further development.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board denied service connection for residuals of rheumatic fever, finding no evidence of current disability related to service. The claim was reopened and the Veteran's ischemic heart disease claim is remanded due to insufficient medical opinion regarding potential jet fuel exposure.,Service connection for ischemic heart disease remains pending as a new theory of causation (jet fuel exposure) requires further examination.
- Remanded (sent back)
The appeal is being remanded to the RO for additional development, including providing the Veteran with proper VCAA notice.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has ordered remand due to the need for additional development, including obtaining VA and private treatment records, and a VA cardiology examination.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.