The Board found that the veteran does not have additional disability as a result of VA treatment for a pulmonary embolism in 1999, and thus denied compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151.
The deciding factor: The evidence did not establish that the veteran's pulmonary embolism was caused by carelessness, negligence, lack of proper skill, error in judgment or similar instance of fault on the part of VA in furnishing hospital care, medical or surgical treatment, or examination.
- Claimed conditions
- Pulmonary Embolism
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 28, 2006
- Citation
- 0630507
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0630507.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided that there is insufficient evidence to determine if the Veteran's death was caused by service-connected conditions, and thus remanded for further development. The case will be reviewed again with a focus on verifying any potential exposure to herbicides in service and obtaining medical opinions regarding the cause of the Veteran's pulmonary embolism.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient medical opinions regarding the etiology of the Veteran's pulmonary embolism and whether it is related to service-connected prostate cancer.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's death was due to a pulmonary embolism. The appellant seeks service connection for this condition based on exposure to herbicides, specifically Agent Orange. The Board has ordered additional development including obtaining the Veteran’s military personnel records and verifying his exposure to herbicide agents. A VA medical opinion is needed to determine if there is a relationship between the Veteran's death and his in-service exposure to herbicides.
- Denied
The Veteran's death was not service-connected for burial purposes due to the absence of a service-connected disability at the time of his death. The claim for accrued benefits was also denied as there were no pending claims or unpaid benefits at the time of his death.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.