Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Whole decision: Denied

The veteran's claims for increased evaluations and TDIU were denied. The RO found that the veteran did not meet the criteria for an evaluation in excess of the current ratings assigned for his service-connected disabilities.

The deciding factor: The evidence did not show visible or palpable tissue loss, gross distortion or asymmetry of one feature or paired set of features, nor two or three of the other eight characteristics of disfigurement for scars of the head and nose. The veteran's right knee prosthesis was found to have chronic residuals consisting of severe painful motion or weakness in the affected extremity, ankylosis of the knee, extension limited to 30 degrees, or nonunion of the tibia and fibula with loose motion requiring a brace. The veteran did not meet the criteria for moderately severe injury of the right anterior thigh muscles for residuals of gunshot wound to the right thigh. There were no recurrence or residuals noted for postoperative squamous cell cancer of the left true vocal cord.

Claimed conditions
Otitis externa (ear infection), Postoperative squamous cell cancer of the left true vocal cord, Residuals of gunshot wound to the right thigh, Right knee prosthesis, Scars of the head and nose
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
October 6, 2006
Citation
0631441

Veterans Law Judge

KATHLEEN K. GALLAGHER

Decisions by this judge: 1,013 · Granted: 17% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0631441.

What this means for you

A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.

What you can do next

Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.