The Board found that the veteran's eye disorders, including bilateral posterior subscapular cataracts and retinosa pigmentosa, were not incurred or aggravated by military service, nor may they be presumed to have been incurred therein. The evidence did not support a nexus between the veteran's claimed radiation exposure in service and his current eye disorders.
The deciding factor: The dose estimates for the veteran's exposure to ionizing radiation during service were found to be below levels that could cause posterior subcapsular cataracts, which are listed as a radiogenic disease at 38 C.F.R. § 3.311(b)(2). The Board concluded that there was no reasonable possibility that the veteran's eye disorders resulted from his exposure to ionizing radiation in service.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral posterior subscapular cataracts, retinosa pigmentosa
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 13, 2006
- Citation
- 0631923
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0631923.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.