The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased initial ratings for his right wrist disability and scar, finding that the evidence did not warrant a higher rating under applicable VA regulations.
The deciding factor: The medical evidence showed no ankylosis of the wrist or significant limitation of motion, which are necessary to justify a higher rating under relevant diagnostic codes.
- Claimed conditions
- Right Wrist Disability, Right Wrist Scar
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 10%
- Decision date
- October 18, 2006
- Citation
- 0632492
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,084 · Granted: 20% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0632492.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's request for a second extension of his delimiting date beyond March 26, 2023, for Post-9/11 GI Bill educational assistance benefits due to lack of medical infeasibility and inability to initiate or complete education during his period of eligibility.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's service connection claims for erectile dysfunction and voiding dysfunction have been denied due to the lack of evidence linking these conditions to his in-service exposure.,The remaining service connection claims (for bilateral feet, ankles, hip, wrist, cervical spine, upper extremity radiculopathy, psychiatric disorder, GERD, sleep apnea, and hypertension) are remanded for further development.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for right shoulder and right wrist disabilities due to a lack of medical opinions addressing the etiology of these conditions.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has denied service connection for right and left knee disabilities, as well as a right wrist disability. The back disability claim is remanded due to the inextricably intertwined nature with the bilateral foot disability.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.