The Board has ordered additional development to determine if the veteran was treated for frostbite in service, which could support his claim for service connection for residuals of frozen feet.
The deciding factor: Additional evidence is needed to substantiate the veteran's claim for service connection due to potential treatment for frostbite during service.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of frozen feet
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 19, 2006
- Citation
- 0632586
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0632586.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Partly granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's current low back strain is not related to his service, and there is no new evidence to reopen a claim of service connection for residuals of frozen feet.,There is no new and material evidence to support reopening the claim of service connection for residuals of frozen feet.,There is no new and material evidence to support reopening the claim of service connection for bilateral pes planus.,The Veteran's tinea pedis does not warrant a compensable rating.
- Partly granted
The Veteran was granted service connection for frostbite of the feet and a 10 percent disability rating for a service-connected scar, right great toe, effective March 20, 2008.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of frozen feet, as there was no evidence to support a link between his current condition and his active duty service.
- Denied
The Board found that the veteran does not have current residuals of frozen feet, a right eye disorder or a right upper eyelid disorder related to service. The nasal fracture also did not result in a compensable rating.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.