The Board has decided to remand the case for further development, including scheduling an orthopedic examination and obtaining a medical opinion regarding the etiology of the veteran's low back disability.
The deciding factor: The Board found that a medical opinion is required to make a decision on the claim due to conflicting evidence in the record.
- Claimed conditions
- low back injury residuals
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 23, 2006
- Citation
- 0632729
Veterans Law Judge
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0632729.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate examination and new evidence is needed to determine if the Veteran's lumbar spine disability, including low back injury residuals, is related to her service or a service-connected condition.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities (insomnia, low back injury residuals, right upper extremity radiculopathy, cervical spine injury residuals, and tinnitus) meet the criteria for a total rating for compensation purposes based on individual unemployability due to service connected disabilities. The Veteran is also eligible for TDIU benefits.
- Granted
The Board has granted the Veteran's appeals for service connection for posttraumatic stress disorder and low back injury residuals, effective April 25, 2016. The earlier effective dates for these conditions are being remanded.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for the grant of service connection for unspecified depressive disorder was denied. The Board found no evidence indicating that the Veteran filed a claim prior to July 25, 2013, and thus could not assign an earlier effective date. For the TDIU issue, the Board determined that there was at least equipoise evidence showing that the Veteran's service-connected disabilities prevented him from securing and following substantially gainful employment prior to February 27, 2019.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.