The Board previously denied the veteran's claim of entitlement to service connection for a cardiovascular disorder, claimed as secondary to his service-connected residuals of perforating gunshot wound. The Court has ordered further development due to incomplete examination and remanded for additional medical opinions.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner did not consider all possible in-service causes of the veteran's current cardiovascular conditions, including whether the GSW aggravated the veteran's conditions or if they are related to his service-connected anxiety disorder.
- Claimed conditions
- cardiovascular condition
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 27, 2006
- Citation
- 0633401
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,592 · Granted: 19% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0633401.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
Your appeal has been dismissed due to the Veteran's death. No rating decision was made on any of your claims.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection due to insufficient evidence and a need for further investigation into toxic exposure risk activities.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for a cardiovascular condition and a lung condition to have the AOJ undertake development to attempt to corroborate the Veteran's contentions regarding his purported exposure to toxic herbicide agents while in service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for GERD, dyspepsia, a cardiovascular condition, and a right wrist condition due to inadequate VA examinations.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.